The most recent edition of Sabretache. The Journal and Proceedings of the Military Historical Society of Australia has been published (Vol LIV No 2, June 2013). It includes my review of
Andrew Tink:
Air Disaster Canberra. The Plane Crash that Destroyed a Government (New South, April 2013, x, 309 pp, b&w photos, notes, index, bibliography. ISBN: 9781742233574)
I enjoyed the book and think it is an important addition to Australia's military and civil aviation history.
Here's the review...
When I first mentioned Air
Disaster Canberra to my military aviation friends there was a ripple of excitement.
We had all heard about the crash, we knew some of the aspects of the story from
the RAAF perspective, we all had our own theories about Bob Hitchcock’s
involvement in the incident, but we had virtually no knowledge of the political
consequences. We anticipated a good read and I was not disappointed. Nor, for
that matter, was anyone else I know who read this remarkable book. Air
Disaster Canberra is divided into
three sections: the political rise of the Anzac generation which includes the
military backgrounds of key politicians, essential for an understanding of the
significance of the loss of their potential contribution to the prosecution of
the war; the last flight of Hudson A16-97 on
13 August 1940; and an account of the destabilisation and destruction of the Menzies
government which led to John Curtin’s prime ministership in October 1941.
At the heart of Air
Disaster Canberra are two arguments. Firstly, that the crash directly led to the change of
government the following year and, secondly, that Jim Fairbairn had been at the
controls of the Hudson when it crashed. Andrew
Tink presents a well constructed case, puts a tragic
accident into its proper political perspective, and blends historical background seamlessly into a well written narrative.
Andrew Tink occasionally overdoes the block quotes—mainly those relating to the inquiry
transcripts—but some are pertinent. For instance, Brudenell White’s words when
he accepted his temporary wartime return to duty are poignant in light of what
was to come: ‘I do not want to act to the detriment of any permanent staff
officer, and as soon as my services are unnecessary I want to return to the
farm’. I also found Menzies’ recollection of his reaction to the death of his
colleagues moving: ‘Gullett was dead; Street was dead; Fairbairn was dead; the
most scholarly and technically talented soldier in Australian history, Sir
Brudenell White whom I had recalled from retirement ... was dead.’ Another was
Sergeant Jo Gullett’s account of the cold, clinical way in which his senior
officer (he was at a British tactical training school at the time) informed him
of the death of his father: ‘I have a message from your General Blamey to say
that I am to inform you that your father was killed in an air accident
yesterday’. He then rattled off the arrangements to return to Australia,
concluding with ‘You may overdraw your pay if you wish. I am sorry about this,
sergeant. I think that is all.’ These are the exceptions that prove that
sometimes block quotes are better than authorial recasting.
This is Andrew Tink’s third book; his first two were biography—William Charles Wentworth: Australia’s greatest native son
won ‘The Nib’ CAL Waverley Award for Literature—and his biographical
skills are again displayed here: he is a particularly talented portrait painter
and the reader gains a clear sense of the ten men who died: the politicians,
Brigadier Geoffrey Street, Minister for the Army and Repatriation; James
Valentine Fairbairn, the Minister for Air and Civil Aviation; Sir Henry Gullett,
vice-president of the Executive Council and Minister in charge of Scientific
and Industrial Research; General Sir Cyril Brudenell White, who came out of
retirement to take up the appointment of Chief of the General Staff; White’s
staff officer, Lieutenant Colonel Francis Thornthwaite; Fairbairn’s private
secretary, Richard Elford; and the four RAAF crew, the Hudson’s pilot Flight Lieutenant Robert Edward Hitchcock, Pilot Officer Richard
Frederick Wiesener, Corporal John Frederick Palmer and Aircraftman Charles
Joseph Crosdale.
Andrew Tink points out Fairbairn had offered Arthur Fadden, the
assistant minister to the treasurer a seat on the Hudson. He later retracted
the offer because it had only been made because he understood Dick Elford would
be travelling by train. But then Elford decided to stay in Melbourne an extra
night to celebrate his wedding anniversary and thus take the seat on the Hudson.
Fadden travelled safely by train and went on to become a short term wartime
prime minister and long serving post war treasurer. Dick Elford climbed into
the Hudson and did not alight at Canberra. It is to Andrew Tink’s credit that he
presents this tragic circumstance simply and lightly, with no weighing of a potential
greater political good of the surviving politician against the loss of the 30
year old loyal husband and father of twin sons.
For many years, Bob Hitchcock’s flying ability has been
called into question, most notably by former RAAF Historian Chris
Coulthard-Clark in The Third Brother and Hitchcock’s near contemporaries, Richard Kingsland and Herb Plenty.
In arguing that Fairbairn was at the controls, Andrew Tink provides evidence
attesting to Hitchcock’s skill with the Hudson and number of incident-free
hours flown in this type. I was very pleased to see this reappraisal of
Hitchcok’s airmanship, after all many fine pilots took time to develop their
skills. Clive Caldwell, for one, admitted that he was not particularly good at
flying when he started out, and Pat Hughes, who was a year behind Hitchcock at
Point Cook, was ranked 28th in his course and assessed as having no outstanding qualities.
Andrew Tink claims that it was perfectly reasonable for
Fairbairn to take the risk of landing the Hudson and that Fairbairn deserves
his place in history as a respected ‘aviation hero, whose pioneering work, both
before and during the war, helped to make flying safer for everyone’. I agree
that Fairbairn should be remembered for his good work but I am not comfortable
that Andrew Tink failed to acknowledge that if Fairbairn was at the controls,
he was responsible for the deaths of nine men as well as his own. That aside, I was fascinated by Andrew Tink’s account of the
demise of Hudson A16-97 and all on board. Ultimately, I was swayed by his
reasoned speculation about Fairbairn and his careful analysis of the
consequences of the loss of three cabinet ministers. I
fully agree with his disappointment in the current state of the Canberra
memorial to the crash’s victims. But where Canberra fails to honour, Air Disaster Canberra does not. This is
a fine tribute to the men who died in the Hudson crash. Highly recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment